BAM is proud to annouce that Dr Jeffrey Pfeffer has been confirmed as the main plenary speaker at BAM2012.
Jeffrey Pfeffer is the Thomas D. Dee II Professor of Organizational...
How can we make this website better? Tell us! bam@bam.ac.uk
BAM is proud to annouce that Dr Jeffrey Pfeffer has been confirmed as the main plenary speaker at BAM2012.
Jeffrey Pfeffer is the Thomas D. Dee II Professor of Organizational...
Latest Conference News:
Submission is open. Deadline for papers is the 29th February. Click here for all conference information.
Available from May 2011:
New online membership features including: member log-in; profiles; renewals; registrations and more.
Researcher Development Gateway
Year-round workshops, events and capacity building initiatives designed to develop the skills of researchers at all career stages.
Networking Opportunities
BAM Membership includes access to our Special Interest Group (SIG) networks. Click here to find out more.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Early View: BJM / IJMR journal articles in advance of print
___________________________________________________________________
|
The purpose of this paper is to develop a multiple-indicator multiple-cause model to explain dynamic capabilities generation. We use one of the main common effects of dynamic capabilities (operational, structural and strategic flexibility) to design a measurement tool for dynamic capabilities generation. Based on this measurement tool, we test the influence of several factors identified in the specialized literature as potential causes that trigger and promote dynamic capabilities generation. We use data from a survey of 200 CEOs of Spanish firms to test the model. The results show that only organizations whose managers have perceived a high degree of environmental dynamism have generated dynamic capabilities. The results also show that knowledge codification and technical innovation are significantly related to dynamic capabilities generation. We attempt to shed light on current theoretical debates about dynamic capabilities generation and provide a practical guide to explain the origin and results of dynamic capabilities that have been tested empirically. |
___________________________________________________________________
|
While much of the literature on gender focuses on role models, this paper extends the understanding of gendered professional identification processes by exploring these processes through the lenses of idealization and admiration. Using the method of discourse analysis to analyse MBA students' accounts of people with whom they identify, this paper explores discourses of idealization, defined as aggrandizing a person, and of admiration, which means discussing positive as well as negative and neutral characteristics of a person. It is shown, first, that most male and female MBA students idealized the self-made ‘authentic’ CEO or founder of an organization and, second, that women mainly admired other women through naming their positive, neutral and negative attributes. The paper thereby adds to understanding of how gendered identification processes are structured by idealization and admiration. |
___________________________________________________________________
|
This study of n = 201 knowledge workers examines positive and negative spillover between work and home and its interrelation with life satisfaction. Additionally, it accounts for the direct effect of role importance on life satisfaction and its moderating effect on the interrelation between spillover and life satisfaction. Central to role importance is the degree of attachment that an individual places on family role and career role. Positive spillover from home is interrelated with higher life satisfaction, whereas negative spillover from work is related to lower life satisfaction. Family role importance and career role importance are associated with higher life satisfaction. For respondents with higher family role importance, there is a stronger interrelation between negative spillover from home and lower life satisfaction. |